Reimagining Post-Pandemic Reading Recovery in ESL Higher Education: Predictors and Pedagogical Pathways
Authors
Research Scholar, Arignar Anna Government Arts Cheyyar College, Thiruvalluvar University, Serkkadu, Vellore-632115, Tamil Nadu India (India)
Assistant Professor Deparment of English, Arignar Anna Government Arts Cheyyar College, Thiruvalluvar University, Serkkadu, Vellore-632115, Tamil Nadu India (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800036
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 15/8 | Page No: 509-520
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-16
Accepted: 2026-08-21
Published: 2026-09-07
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered all aspects of higher education, changing access methods, altering the way students processed, and engaged with academic texts. Post-pandemic research has focused on the learning gap created in math and school-level literacy. The long-term effects of reading comprehension for tertiary English as a second language (ESL) education have received little focus. This gap is detrimental in long-term effects, as reading comprehension is essential for success in higher education and for the generation of knowledge that will drive critical thought and learning. Many students arrived on campuses with the effects of the pandemic evident in their lack of endurance, motivation, and confidence.
This paper offers a critical synthesis of post-pandemic reading recovery scholarship across a variety of disciplines, including applied linguistics, literacy studies, educational psychology, digital pedagogy, and higher education studies. This review presents reading recovery as a complex, multidimensional system. The paper argues that reading recovery cannot be simply restated as increased exposure to reading combined with remedial language training, and that there needs to be combined structural and pedagogical shifts to accomplish reading recovery.In response, the authors provide a strategic reading recovery framework (SRRF) that encompasses the use of blended reading ecologies, digitally participatory reading, collaborative reading communities, blended reading ecologies, and artificial intelligence. Based on the review and the presented framework, it is clear that reading recovery should not be understood as a return to inequitable pandemic reading recovery measures. Instead, it advocates for a novel approach to integrated pedagogy, sustaining futures of digital pedagogy, and prioritizing educational equity. The authors outlined a reading recovery framework for ESL higher education, which provides a set of research and policy recommendations for flexible and resilient reading recovery approaches.
Keywords
ESL higher education; reading recovery; post-pandemic learning; academic literacy; reading comprehension; digital pedagogy; metacognition
Downloads
References
1. Anderson, Neil J. “Individual Differences in Strategy Use in Second Language Reading and Testing.” Modern Language Journal, vol. 75, no. 4, 1991, pp. 460-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Day, Richard R., and Julian Bamford. Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge UP, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Grabe, William. Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge UP, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Holec, Henri. Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Pergamon, 1981. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Kress, Gunther. Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge, 2003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Masten, Ann S. “Ordinary Magic: Resilience Processes in Development.” American Psychologist, vol. 56, no. 3, 2001, pp. 227-38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Nation, I. S. P. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge UP, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Pressley, Michael. Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices. Guilford Press, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Shanahan, Timothy, and Cynthia Shanahan. “Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents.” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 78, no. 1, 2008, pp. 40-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Snow, Catherine. Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. RAND, 2002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. UNESCO. Reimagining Our Futures Together: Education and Learning after COVID-19. UNESCO, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Vygotsky, Lev S. Mind in Society. Harvard UP, 1978. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Zimmerman, Barry J. “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner.” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, 2002, pp. 64-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Study to Assess the Impact of a Nurse-Led Educational Intervention on Knowledge Regarding Oral Health Among Primigravida in Selected Hospitals of Navi Mumbai
- Attitude towards Mathematics and Science in Relation to STEM Career Aspirations among Senior Secondary School Students
- AI-Driven Personalized Learning in Educational Systems: A Framework for Adaptive Learning and Decision Support
- Institutionalizing Indigenous Peoples Education in Philippine Basic Education: Development of the Integrated Institutionalization Framework for Indigenous Peoples Education (IIF-IPEd)
- Toward an Integrated Theory of Enterprise Risk Management: A Multi-Theoretical Conceptual Framework