Effects of Water Quality on the Workability and Compressive Strength of Concrete in Karim-Lamido Local Government Area, Taraba State, Nigeria.
Authors
Department of Building Technology, Taraba State Polytechnic, Suntai, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Technology Education, Modibbo Adama University, Yola, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Technical Education, College of Education, Hong, Adamawa State, Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Building Technology, Taraba State Polytechnic, Suntai, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Building Technology, Taraba State Polytechnic, Suntai, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900147
Subject Category: Engineering
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 2935-2950
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-28
Accepted: 2026-10-03
Published: 2026-10-23
Abstract
This study provides source-specific screening evidence on effects of non-potable mixing water in local practice in Karim-Lamido LGA, Taraba State. Water samples from three sources per alternative (well, borehole, stream, n=9) collected 28/03/2026 and analysed 30/03/2026 at TAWSC Central Lab (Refs 400&401) showed Stream Acceptable (TSS 1.142-1.311 mg/L, TDS 218-432 mg/L, sulphate 12-80 mg/L, EC 266 522 µS/cm, pH 6.78-7.56) while Borehole Not acceptable (sulphate 120-155 mg/L >100, EC 1480-1494 µS/cm >1000, TDS 1194-1207 mg/L >500, pH 6.30) and Well Not acceptable (pH 6.00-6.32<6.5, TDS 827 mg/L, sulphate 110 mg/L, EC 1024 µS/cm). Tap control from treated municipal supply per NSDWQ, ASTM C1602 Section 4.1 and BS EN 1008 Clause 3.1 served as potable reference without separate analysis. Sixty 150mm cubes were cast 16/05/2026 within 2h29min (14:47-17:16) using same batch of Dangote cement BlocMaster 42.5R, lateritic unwashed sand, hand-crushed irregular 20-40mm aggregate, 1:2:4 head pan, estimated w/c ∼0.70, manual mixing on bare ground, demoulded at 24h02-05 and cured at 23±2°C (Table 1A, Plate 1 Supplementary). Slump per MOW Jalingo CNT 3.0 (Tester Shuyur Jesse Ruth 3/7/2026): Stream 90mm, Borehole 120mm, Well 170mm descriptive only. Compressive strengths were low due to local materials and methods but comparable internally: 28-day Tap 5.39 N/mm² > Borehole 3.40 > Stream 3.60 > Well 2.36 N/mm². Visual clarity did not predict chemical compliance or strength. Primary inference is a factorial water source effect; chemical correlations are hypothesis-generating only (n=9). Recommendation is procedural: do not approve water by generic category or visual inspection; conduct source-specific trial mix versus potable control per ASTM C1602/BS EN 1008 requiring strength ratio ≥0.90 before use
Keywords
Mixing water; Source-specific screening; Lateritic concrete; Compressive strength; ASTM C1602
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Akinmusuru, J. O., & Akinwumi, I. I. (2018). Influence of water quality on strength characteristic of concrete. International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, 10(4), 245–252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, & Water Environment Federation. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). APHA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. ASTM International. (2022). ASTM C1602/C1602M-22: Standard specification for mixing water used in the production of hydraulic cement concrete. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/C1602_C1602M-22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. British Standards Institution. (2002). BS EN 1008:2002: Mixing water for concrete—Specification for sampling, testing and assessing the suitability of water, including water recovered from processes in the concrete industry, as mixing water for concrete. BSI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. British Standards Institution. (2009). BS EN 12390-3:2009: Testing hardened concrete—Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. BSI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ikpa, C. C., Nwankwo, E. J., & Kaizer, A. N. (2021). Evaluation of water quality impact on the compressive strength of concrete. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(1), 390–404. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Liu, H., Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2026). Mechanistic influence of water chemistry on cement hydration through acidity–alkalinity interactions governing strength and durability. Results in Engineering, 21, 103456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.103456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, properties, and materials (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, characteristic, and materials (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Neville A. M., (1995) Cementitious Materials of Different Types, Pearson Education Asia Pte. Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of concrete (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nigerian Industrial Standard. (2015). NIS 554:2015: Nigerian standard for drinking water quality. Standards Organisation of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ojo, O. M., Alawode, M. A., & Idowu, S. O. (2019). Effect of water quality on compressive strength of concrete. European Scientific Journal, 15(12), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n12p172 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Olonade, K. A., Oladiran, G. F., & Adebisi, W. (2022). Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of concrete using different sources of water for mixing and curing concrete. Results in Engineering, 14, 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Olonade, K. A., Oladiran, G. F., & Adebisi, W. (2022). Experimental investigation on mechanical characteristic of concrete using different sources of water for mixing and curing concrete. Results in Engineering, 14, 100428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Sangiorgio, F., Mancini, G., & Bianchi, M. (2022). Investigating the influence of initial water pH on concrete strength gain using a sensor and sclerometric-test combination. Infrastructures, 7(12), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7120159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Setiawan, A., Pratama, R., & Wibowo, D. (2022). The effect of water pH in concrete mixtures and curing conditions on compressive strength. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 999, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/999/1/012006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Shetty M.S (2006). Concrete Technology (Theory and practice), First Multi colour illustrative revised Edition 2005: Rajendra Ravindra Printers Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Taylor, H. F. W., Famy, C., & Scrivener, K. L. (2001). Delayed ettringite formation. Cement and Concrete Research, 31(5), 683–693. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Wang, X., Zhang, L., & Chen, L. (2024). Mechanism and performance control methods of sulfate attack on concrete: A review. Materials, 17(19), 4836. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17194836 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. World Health Organization. (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality: Fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, Q., & Cheng, S. (2024). Effects of mixing water and environmental pH value on the compressive strength of concrete. Scientific Reports, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66618-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0