Exploring Social Media-Enabled Environmental Governance in India’s Namami Gange Programme: An Expert-Based DEMATEL–ISM Study

This study develops an exploratory expert-based structural model of social media-enabled environmental governance (SMeEG) in India’s Namami Gange Programme. Drawing on collaborative governance, digital governance and public value perspectives, the study defines and examines thirteen interrelated constructs that may shape the perceived functioning of digitally mediated environmental governance. Judgements from a twelve-member expert panel were analysed using an integrated Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)–Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) procedure. DEMATEL was used to identify relative influence, prominence and net-effect positions, while ISM was used to derive an interpretive reachability hierarchy. The analysis places digital infrastructure and platform accessibility, government commitment and policy support, governance transparency and accountability, and citizens’ digital literacy among the most influential foundational conditions in the expert-perceived system. Multi-stakeholder collaboration occupies an intermediate coordinating position, while trust, social listening, communication, awareness, influencer participation and citizen engagement occupy progressively more dependent positions. Environmental governance effectiveness appears as the ultimate outcome node. These findings should be interpreted as expert-perceived structural relationships rather than estimates of observed causal effects or empirically validated temporal sequences. The study contributes an exploratory structural framework that can guide subsequent survey, case-based or longitudinal validation in the Namami Gange context and comparable environmental-governance settings.

Social media; environmental governance; collaborative governance; digital governance; DEMATEL; ISM; expert-based structural modelling; Namami Gange

1. Abdulkareem, A. K., & Ramli, R. M. (2022). Does trust in e-government influence the performance of e-government? An integration of information system success model and public value theory. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(1), 1–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Acey, C. (2016). Managing wickedness in the Niger Delta: Can a new approach to multi-stakeholder governance increase voice and sustainability? Landscape and Urban Planning, 154, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alhusaini, E. A. (2025). Sustainability governance in higher education: An analytical study of the current state and challenges in environmental, social, and governance practices in Saudi Arabia. Advances and Applications in Statistics, 92(5), 797–812. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alqahtani, A. Y., & Makki, A. A. (2023). A DEMATEL-ISM integrated Modeling approach of influencing factors shaping destination image in the tourism industry. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Amirova, A. (2025). Advancing citizen-centered public services in Kazakhstan: Legal, institutional, and digital governance perspectives. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1679601. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anand, A., Saboo, A. R., & Adhyapak, R. (2026). Climate communications in IPOs: Unpacking the influence of climate disclosure volume, sender, and message characteristics. Journal of Marketing. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Arenas-Márquez, F. J., Martínez-Torres, M. R., & Toral, S. L. (2014). Electronic word-of-mouth communities from the perspective of social network analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(8), 927–942. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Armitage, D., De Loë, R., & Plummer, R. (2012). Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 5(4), 245–255. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bondielli, A., & Marcelloni, F. (2019). A survey on fake news and rumour detection techniques. Information Sciences, 497, 38–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bressers, H. T., & Rosenbaum, W. A. (2003). Achieving Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Governance Across Social Scales. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, J.-K. (2021). Improved DEMATEL-ISM integration approach for complex systems. PLOS ONE, 16(7), e0254694. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chen, Y., Ghosh, M., Liu, Y., & Zhao, L. (2019). Media coverage of climate change and sustainable product consumption: Evidence from the hybrid vehicle market. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(6), 995–1011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Confetto, M. G., Covucci, C., Addeo, F., & Normando, M. (2023). Sustainability advocacy antecedents: How social media content influences sustainable behaviours among Generation Z. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(6), 758–774. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dahab, S., Adenle, Y. A., & Alshuwaikhat, H. M. (2025). Development of a smart and sustainable rating system platform for Saudi neighborhoods. Urban Science, 9(11), 466. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. de Andrade, F. M. R. (2024). Environmental education in the Brazilian Amazon, in Pará State: The meanings of environmental governance. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(4), 871–883. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Diouf, D., & Boiral, O. (2017). The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 643–667. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Eckerd, A., & Heidelberg, R. L. (2020). Administering public participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2), 133–147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Firmstone, J., & Coleman, S. (2015). Public engagement in local government: The voice and influence of citizens in online communicative spaces. Information, Communication & Society, 18(6), 680–695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Fitzpatrick, K. R., & Weissman, P. L. (2021). Public relations in the age of data: Corporate perspectives on social media analytics (SMA). Journal of Communication Management, 25(4), 401–416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Giacomini, D., Rocca, L., Zola, P., & Mazzoleni, M. (2021). Local governments’ environmental disclosure via social networks: Organizational legitimacy and stakeholders’ interactions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 128290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Giacomini, D., Zola, P., Paredi, D., & Mazzoleni, M. (2020). Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1552–1564. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Glenski, M., Weninger, T., & Volkova, S. (2018). Propagation from deceptive news sources: Who shares, how much, how evenly, and how quickly? IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 5(4), 1071–1082. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Gupta, A., Boas, I., & Oosterveer, P. (2020). Transparency in global sustainability governance: To what effect? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 84–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hamish, F., Tom, Q., & Clementine, O. (2021). Food waste index report 2021. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi, Kenya: 20219789280738513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Herrera, L. C., & Gjosæter, T. (2026). Overcoming the limitations of social media analytics: Dynamic capabilities and workaround strategies for inclusive and resilient public service continuity. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 142, 106216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hong, H. (2013). Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 346–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Huisman, M. (2021). van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Cambridge/Medford: Polity. 208 pp. Communications, 46(4), 611–612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1994). Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Journal of Public Policy, 14(2), 175–203. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Jin, J., & Wang, Y. (2025). Can public data openness reduce carbon emissions of listed companies? Evidence from China. Energy Reports, 13, 5512–5524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jing, J., Zhang, Z., Choo, K. K. R., Fan, K., Song, B., & Zhang, L. (2023). Inference of user desires to spread disinformation based on social situation analytics and group effect. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 20(3), 1833–1848. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Kolcava, D. (2023). Greenwashing and public demand for government regulation. Journal of Public Policy, 43(1), 179–198. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Kusuma, A. W., Christian, M., Thaib, D., & Pangaribuan, C. H. (2026). Environmental governance and ISPO implementation success in oil palm plantation landscapes: The mediating role of corporate environmental commitment. Environments, 13(6), 326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ma, P., Song, Y., & Zhang, M. (2023). Mediating and spatial spillover effects of public participation in environmental pollution governance mediated via traditional and new media. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118046. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Medaglia, R., & Zheng, L. (2017). Mapping government social media research and moving it forward: A framework and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 496–510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Meijer. (2013). Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency. Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.qulib.idm.oclc.org/doi/full/10.1111/puar.12032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Misal, N., Bhimani, H., Väätänen, J., & Mention, A.-L. (2026). Steering socially sustainable behaviour: How digital platforms can drive sustainable mobility. The TQM Journal, 38(11), 104–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Niu, Y., Wang, X., & Lin, C. (2022). A study on the impact of organizing environmental awareness and education on the performance of environmental governance in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12852. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Ojala, M. (2015). Hope in the face of climate change: Associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3), 133–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Park, S., Lee, J. Y., Notley, T., & Dezuanni, M. (2023). Exploring the relationship between media literacy, online interaction, and civic engagement. The Information Society, 39(4), 250–261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Springer New York. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Porumbescu, G. (2017). Linking transparency to trust in government and voice. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 520–537. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Porumbescu, G. A. (2017). Not all bad news after all? Exploring the relationship between citizens’ use of online mass media for government information and trust in government. International Public Management Journal, 20(3), 409–441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Purnomo, E. P., Ramdani, R., Agustiyara, Nurmandi, A., Trisnawati, D. W., & Fathani, A. T. (2021). Bureaucratic inertia in dealing with annual forest fires in Indonesia. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 30(10), 733–744. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Rice, W. S. (2022). Exploring common dialectical tensions constraining collaborative communication required for post-2020 conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2371859 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Saha, S., & Mohr, R. D. (2013). Media attention and the toxics release inventory. Ecological Economics, 93, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Savitska, V. (2025). Digitalisation of the public administration system in the context of economic and legal areas of European integration. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 270–280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Sen, K. K., Hosan, S., Karmaker, S. C., Chapman, A. J., & Saha, B. B. (2025). Environmental taxes and renewable energy consumption nexus: Role of environmental governance and technological innovation. Sustainable Futures, 9, Article 100825. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Sheng, P. F., & Liu, W. L. (2024). Does the government's green commitment matter for energy conservation in China? The role of public spending. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 1061–1073. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Song, C., & Lee, J. (2016). Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 430–453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Sullivan, J. (2014). China’s Weibo: Is faster different? New Media & Society, 16(1), 24–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Ten Brink, P. (Ed.). (2011). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in national and international policy making. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Thanh, L. T. H., & Thanh, N. V. (2026). Environmental education for strengthening ecological awareness, sustainable development, prosperity, and human well-being. Sophia: Colección de Filosofía de la Educación, (40), 329–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Tuffour, J., Ackah, B., Blay, M. W., Oduro, R. A., & Adela, V. (2026). Governance, ownership, and carbon transparency in institutional voids: The contingent role of environmental committees in Sub-Saharan Africa. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Valentine, S. V. (2012). Policies for enhancing corporate environmental management: A framework and an applied example. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(5), 338–350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Valsdóttir, E., Rice, J. G., & Ögmundardóttir, H. (2026). Environmental justice and carbon capture in Iceland: Resistance to Coda Terminal. Environmental Justice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Vargas, P. J. J. (2026). Governance of artificial intelligence and environmental justice: An analysis from international and European law. Revista de Derecho Político, (126), 293–317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Villca-Pozo, M., & Gonzales-Bustos, J. P. (2019). Tax incentives to modernize the energy efficiency of housing in Spain. Energy Policy, 128, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Wan, F., Zhou, X., & Zhao, G. (2023). Knowledge gain in environmental policy agenda on government social media. Journal of Global Information Management, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.324949 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Wang, J., & Jia, Y. (2021). Social media’s influence on air quality improvement: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126769. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Wu, L. R., Li, J. J., Qi, J. Y., Kong, D. L., & Li, X. (2021). The role of opinion leaders in the sustainable development of corporate-led consumer advice networks: Evidence from a Chinese travel content community. Sustainability, 13(19), 11128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Xu, P., Yao, X., Lan, L., Xu, K., & Bao, C. (2022). Research on the paths and effectiveness of governance tools based on the evolution of environmental NIMBY event. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 1985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Yavuz, Ş., & Tire, E. (2023). A survey of corporate communication professionals’ perspective on social listening and analytics. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 28(4), 564–581. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Zeqiri, A., Ben Youssef, A., & Zahar, T. M. (2025). The role of digital tourism platforms in advancing sustainable development goals in the Industry 4.0 era. Sustainability, 17(8), 3482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Zimmermann, A., Kenter, J. O., & Dyke, A. (2026). The way enthusiasm builds: Frame amplification and emotional reinforcement in participatory policymaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 205(1), 49–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Employee Suggestion Schemes as a Driver of Innovation and Value Creation in Organizations
• Profitability, Growth and Market Valuation of Leading Pharmaceutical Companies in India: A Comparative Financial Analysis
• Problems and Prospects of Sale Employees of Non-Banking Financial Companies
• Core Temperature Estimation and Thermal Management of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using a Nonlinear Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter
• A Conceptual Analysis of How Sustainable Public Procurement Practices Influence Value for Money in Developing Economies